VoiceTaking vs ScribeFox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ScribeFox | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | The meeting note taker that hears the whole room | AI video to text transcription with editing and export |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | ID | Not given |
| Pricing model | Not given | Freemium |
| Pricing | Pro: $10/month (30 hours of meeting transcription per month, unlimited meetings and templates, unlimited AI summaries and action items, 24/7 support). Pro Annual: $68/year (same features as Pro). | Free: 20 welcome credits (Standard 20 min or Best 10 min, one file at a time, results expire after 7 days). Pro: €94.9/year (€7.9/mo equivalent, billed yearly, 21,600 annual credits upfront, up to 10 concurrent transcriptions, results saved indefinitely). Pay as you go: 1,800 credits €19.9, 4,000 cr |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 24 no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 4 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 73 | 1 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to VoiceTaking More alternatives to ScribeFox