Pixal3D vs STL Splitter
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Pixal3D compared with STL Splitter
| Detail |
Pixal3D |
STL Splitter |
| What it does | Image to textured 3D model from a photo
| Free online tool to cut large 3D models into pieces that fit your printer
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free for all features
|
|---|
| Key features | - Image-to-3D generation with pixel-aligned reconstruction
- Textured GLB export with PBR materials
- Trellis 2 comparison lane for alternative reconstructions
- Free browser-based GLB inspection and conversion tools
- Text-to-motion generation with Hunyuan Motion
- Adjustable output settings for quality and file size
| - Supports 70+ 3D printer presets (Bambu, Prusa, Creality, Elegoo, Anycubic, Voron)
- Automatic and manual cutting modes
- Interlocking pegs and joints with adjustable clearance
- Real-time 3D preview of cuts
- Handles files up to 200 MB
- Reads STL, binary STL, ASCII STL and 3MF formats
- Exports each piece as individual STL files
- Separate dowels option for stronger joints
- Cross pins for improved strength
- No file upload to servers, all processing local to browser
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Pixel-aligned fidelity preserves source image detail and silhouette in 3D geometry
- Pay-per-job pricing instead of monthly subscriptions
- Free browser tools run locally without consuming credits
- Inspect and review results before spending credits
- Compare Pixal3D and Trellis 2 lanes on the same source image
| - Free with no sign-up, account or watermark required
- No file upload to servers; all processing happens locally in your browser
- Cuts entire model to bed size in one step with interlocking pegs
- Real boolean cutting preserves surface detail on uncut axes
- Works in any browser with no installation needed
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 22 ● no change since last check | 2 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 14 | 17 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 69 | 4 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Pixal3D More alternatives to STL Splitter