Wearly Labs vs ImageToBeads
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Wearly Labs compared with ImageToBeads
| Detail | 
Wearly Labs | 
ImageToBeads |
|---|
| What it does | Know what suits you, and why
| Free Perler bead pattern maker that converts photos into editable bead patterns
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CZ
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | $29 once, no subscription
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Color season analysis with 50-color palette
- Body shape and line recommendations with 125+ cuts
- Six ready-made outfits for different situations
- AI profile exportable to ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini
- Photo analysis with five images required
- Questionnaire-based personalization
- Reasoning provided for every verdict
- Photos deleted within 24 hours
- Fixed scoring rules ensure consistent results
| - Upload photos and illustrations in JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, and HEIC formats
- Support for multiple bead brands including Perler, Hama, MARD, Artkal, and Nabbi
- Crop and select specific parts of images
- Merge rare colors and clean isolated cells
- Local draft auto-save with one recoverable draft per device
- Export complete PNG with grid, color legend, and bead quantities
- Optional color codes in exported patterns
- Manual editing tools and undo functionality
- No account required for core functionality
- Mobile-friendly workspace
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Every verdict includes the reason why a color or cut suits you
- Fixed rule-based scoring ensures the same inputs produce the same result
- One-time payment with no subscription or hidden costs
- Results available on personal page within 10 minutes
- Answers weighted more heavily than photos in analysis
| - Maps images to actual bead palettes rather than just reducing resolution
- Automatic bead counting and material quantification
- Uses real bead color references from manufacturers
- All image processing happens locally in the browser with no upload
- Practical pattern creation with editing tools for buildability
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 5 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 8 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 10 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 18 | 22 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 20 | 18 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Wearly Labs More alternatives to ImageToBeads