Wave vs ScribeFox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ScribeFox | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI note taker that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, calls, lectures, and conversations | AI video to text transcription with editing and export |
| Stage | Startup | Not given |
| Founded | 2024 | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 30 minutes per month, free forever. Pro: $80 per year or $15 per month (or $100 per year through App Store/Google Play). Teams: $7.50 per user per month with 5-user minimum. | Free: 20 welcome credits (Standard 20 min or Best 10 min, one file at a time, results expire after 7 days). Pro: €94.9/year (€7.9/mo equivalent, billed yearly, 21,600 annual credits upfront, up to 10 concurrent transcriptions, results saved indefinitely). Pay as you go: 1,800 credits €19.9, 4,000 cr |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 54 −2 (down) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 46 | 4 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1400 | 1 |
5 details filled in for both companies.