Refract vs qus.me

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Refract compared with qus.me
Detail	$Refract logo$ Refract	qus.me
What it does	Social media scheduler that writes native versions for every network	Drafts wait in line. You post them.
Stage	Not given	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	US	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Free
Pricing	Creator: $10/month or $120/year; Business: $24/month or $288/year; Agency: $49/month or $588/year; Agency Plus: $99/month or $1,188/year. All plans include 12 networks, API, MCP and webhooks. Additional AI credits: 250 for $5, 1,000 for $15, 5,000 for $60.	Free while in beta. The hosted MCP server at app.qus.me is free during beta and may become paid later.
Key features	Studio for images and video editing API, webhooks and CLI for automation	Browser extension for Chrome and Firefox End-to-end encrypted draft queue MCP server integration with Claude Per-agent approval and draft limits Draft recovery with 12-word recovery code Agent revocation at any time No analytics or tracking Self-hosted MCP server option Open source code on GitHub
What makes it different	Every network on every plan with no limits on scheduled posts Full approval control before anything publishes AI learns your voice and suggests content rules Agency-grade white-label and client approval links	Only you can click Post—the service never posts automatically Agents cannot read your drafts, only their own Fully encrypted before leaving your device Works with any MCP-compatible agent, not just Claude Queue recovery without losing access to your data
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	2 +1 (up) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	19	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	2	0

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Refract More alternatives to qus.me