Polycam vs Shapeweld
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Polycam compared with Shapeweld
| Detail | 
Polycam | 
Shapeweld |
|---|
| What it does | AI reality capture for professionals
| Browser-based 3D file converter, viewer, and avatar tool
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Spatial capture using LiDAR and photogrammetry
- Object capture for creating 3D models of individual items
- 2D and 3D floor plan generation with automated measurements
- Drone/aerial capture and processing
- Export to 15+ formats including OBJ, FBX, DXF, STL
- Collaborative team editing and shared libraries
- Virtual walkthroughs and 3D viewing
- AI-generated floor plan reports
- Point cloud exports in multiple formats
- Content API for integration
| - Convert between 52 3D file formats including FBX, GLB, OBJ, Blender, STL, and VRM
- View 3D models directly in browser for 15 formats
- Create and edit VRM avatars with 14 specialized tools
- Optimize meshes with compression, decimation and repair in 9 tools
- Preserve skeleton, skin weights, shape keys and textures during conversion
- Support files up to 100 MB with zip archives for textures
- Automatic file deletion after 3 days
- Process files on server with Blender and custom converters
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Trusted by half of Fortune 500 companies
- Works on any smartphone - no special equipment required
- Enterprise-grade security with SOC-2 compliance
- Dedicated white-glove onboarding and support for enterprise
- Cross-platform availability on iOS, Android, and web
| - No account or software installation required
- Viewers run locally on your device without uploading files
- Supports specialized formats like VRM, MMD, XPS and Blender files
- Free access to 300 CC0 avatar models for testing
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 74 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 40 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1968 | 0 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Polycam More alternatives to Shapeweld