ImageToBeads vs Lucide
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ImageToBeads compared with Lucide
| Detail | 
ImageToBeads | 
Lucide |
|---|
| What it does | Free Perler bead pattern maker that converts photos into editable bead patterns
| Beautiful and consistent icon toolkit made by the community
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| NL
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Upload photos and illustrations in JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, and HEIC formats
- Support for multiple bead brands including Perler, Hama, MARD, Artkal, and Nabbi
- Crop and select specific parts of images
- Merge rare colors and clean isolated cells
- Local draft auto-save with one recoverable draft per device
- Export complete PNG with grid, color legend, and bead quantities
- Optional color codes in exported patterns
- Manual editing tools and undo functionality
- No account required for core functionality
- Mobile-friendly workspace
| - Lightweight SVG graphics
- Consistent design
- Customizable color, size, and stroke width
- Tree shakable
- Available for all major package managers
- Active community on GitHub and Discord
- Scalable vector graphics
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Maps images to actual bead palettes rather than just reducing resolution
- Automatic bead counting and material quantification
- Uses real bead color references from manufacturers
- All image processing happens locally in the browser with no upload
- Practical pattern creation with editing tools for buildability
| - Open source and community-driven
- Consistent design with strict design rules
- Tree shakable for optimal performance
- Highly customizable appearance
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 8 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 84 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 37 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 49 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 18 | 6766 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ImageToBeads More alternatives to Lucide