BeadPattern vs Chartory
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
BeadPattern compared with Chartory
| Detail | 
BeadPattern | 
Chartory |
|---|
| What it does | Turn any photo into a printable Perler, Hama or fuse bead pattern in seconds
| Charts that look designed, because they were
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: 100 React charts in Hearth collection, MIT licensed. Figma: $149 once. Code: $249 once. Complete: $349 once. All prices include every update.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Photo to bead pattern conversion
- AI image generation and pattern creation
- Drawing and editing tools
- Color groups and bead counts
- Perler, Hama, and fuse bead support
- Numbered making sheets
- Tiled printing for larger designs
| - 100+ chart types organized by question
- Four responsive sizes (XS, S, M, L) that re-layout from data
- Identical names and props in Figma and React
- Light and dark color modes
- 900+ size and legend variants
- MCP server for AI code agents
- Sector-specific datasets included
- Ready-made dashboard blocks and compositions
- Private registry and GitHub repository access
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Free web-based tool with no sign-up required
- AI-powered image to pattern conversion
- Support for multiple bead brands
- Editable patterns with color groups
| - Same chart name and properties in both Figma design files and React code
- Charts re-layout responsively instead of scaling, keeping text readable at all sizes
- Pay once with all future updates included, no subscription
- Integrated with shadcn and available via MCP for AI agents
- 100 charts free in React under MIT license
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 11 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 1 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 12 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 14 | 2 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to BeadPattern More alternatives to Chartory