Wave vs QuickSnip
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI note taker that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, calls, lectures, and conversations | Affordable screen recording and instant link sharing alternative to Loom |
| Stage | Startup | Startup |
| Founded | 2024 | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 30 minutes per month, free forever. Pro: $80 per year or $15 per month (or $100 per year through App Store/Google Play). Teams: $7.50 per user per month with 5-user minimum. | Free plan with 720p recording and 5GB storage. Pro plan $5/month with 4K recording, 50GB storage, and AI transcriptions. Team plan $8/month with 200GB storage and up to 10 teams. Additional 50GB storage $3/month or 100GB for $20/month. Prices shown with annual billing; 14-day money-back guarantee. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 54 −2 (down) since last check | 45 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 20 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 46 | 26 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1400 | 27 |
6 details filled in for both companies.