shapes vs MLUE
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | A phone-first link-in-bio page builder for creators, musicians, makers and small businesses | A link-in-bio platform for Chinese creators and brands to organize their content, social accounts, and collaboration links in one shareable homepage |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | CN |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: one live page at shapes.bio address with shapes badge, no card needed. Pro: $8/month or $60/year (38% less), includes up to 5 pages, custom domain, badge removal, year of analytics, email signup export, and larger Cove allowance. | Free plan includes basic links, groups, themes, QR codes and 7-day data. Starter: ¥200/year or ¥20/month (includes unlimited links, 1 custom domain, basic themes, link animations, scheduling, access rules, and 365-day click trends). Pro: ¥400/year or ¥40/month (includes all Starter features plus acc |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 18 +2 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 20 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 9 |
5 details filled in for both companies.