AI-powered research assistant for academic writing and scientific discovery
Know which headline wins before you spend traffic on it.
Stage
Startup
Not given
Founded
Not given
Not given
Based in
Not given
Not given
Pricing model
Freemium
Not given
Pricing
Free tier with 800 words. Paid plans: Basic $6.99/month (10,000 words/month for Daily Academic Toolkit, 5,000 for Research Assistant Pro); Pro $10.99/month (50,000 words/month for Toolkit, 7,500 for Pro); Ultimate $35.99/month (unlimited Toolkit access, 15,000 words/month for Research Assistant Pro
Free: $0/month with 5 rankings and 60 Claude-written options monthly. Creator: $19/month with 100 rankings and 2,500 options. Pro: $49/month with 600 rankings and 6,000 options. Agency: $149/month with 3,000 rankings and 20,000 options.
Key features
Literature review tools to find and organize relevant research
Note-taking and mind-mapping features for organizing research insights
Essay and academic writing assistance
Support for responding to reviewer comments and revisions
Grammar checker and citation format conversion
Paraphrasing tools for original content creation
Over 50 modules in Daily Academic Toolkit for essay and research support
Research Highlights Extractor and Content Fusion tools
Multiple AI model integration with seamless switching
End-to-end encryption and advanced security measures
Head-to-head comparison of up to 200 variants
Bradley-Terry model ranking with calibrated odds
Honest uncertainty verdicts: Clear, Lean, Too close to call
Brand profiles to calibrate accuracy on your audience
Works for YouTube titles, subject lines, ad headlines, and article headlines
Accuracy measured on 9,841 held-out A/B tests
What makes it different
Grounded in scientific expertise with content trained on scholarly articles and STM knowledge
Comprehensive all-in-one platform covering entire research lifecycle from idea to publication
User data ownership and privacy protection without using inputs to train base models
Model-agnostic flexibility allowing seamless switching across different LLMs
Journal-standard output optimization for publication-ready academic content
82% accuracy on clear calls, trained on thousands of real A/B tests never seen during tuning
Honest about uncertainty instead of always crowning a winner
56 times cheaper than Claude Sonnet while maintaining comparable accuracy
Custom calibration to your audience's behavior via brand profiles
Compare versions in both orders to cancel out model bias
Scifocus
Click Oracle