AI-powered YouTube script analyzer that identifies likely attention risks before recording
Know which headline wins before you spend traffic on it.
Stage
Startup
Not given
Founded
2024
Not given
Based in
Not given
Not given
Pricing model
Freemium
Not given
Pricing
Ready-to-Record Pass $19 one-time for one script. Creator $29/month or $290/year. Creator Lifetime $149 one-time. Free script check available with no login required.
Free: $0/month with 5 rankings and 60 Claude-written options monthly. Creator: $19/month with 100 rankings and 2,500 options. Pro: $49/month with 600 rankings and 6,000 options. Agency: $149/month with 3,000 rankings and 20,000 options.
Key features
Script attention-risk map showing relative risk across the script
Hook scoring and breakdown with 3 alternative openings
Copy-paste rewrites for hooks, transitions, and weak sections
Title suggestions and rewrites
PDF report export for sharing with editors and teams
Video and audio upload with automatic transcription
Policy pre-flight checks against YouTube guidelines
Channel Scanner to analyze past uploads
Free tools including Title Analyzer, Hook Analyzer, and Comment Miner
Head-to-head comparison of up to 200 variants
Bradley-Terry model ranking with calibrated odds
Honest uncertainty verdicts: Clear, Lean, Too close to call
Brand profiles to calibrate accuracy on your audience
Works for YouTube titles, subject lines, ad headlines, and article headlines
Accuracy measured on 9,841 held-out A/B tests
What makes it different
Analyzes scripts before recording, not after publishing like YouTube Analytics
Provides exact problem text and copy-paste rewrites, not generic advice
14-day money-back guarantee if first audit does not find at least 3 fixable problems
Can analyze your own channel's public video data for niche-specific patterns
Supports plain text scripts, video files up to 5GB, and audio with automatic transcription
82% accuracy on clear calls, trained on thousands of real A/B tests never seen during tuning
Honest about uncertainty instead of always crowning a winner
56 times cheaper than Claude Sonnet while maintaining comparable accuracy
Custom calibration to your audience's behavior via brand profiles
Compare versions in both orders to cancel out model bias