Apograph vs QuickSnip
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Private, on-device transcription for iPhone | Affordable screen recording and instant link sharing alternative to Loom |
| Stage | Startup | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: unlimited recordings and imports, Fast and Balanced models, 99 languages, timed sentences, playback, spell check, text/Markdown/PDF export, Best model on 5 recordings, speaker separation on 3 recordings. Pro: one-time purchase, includes everything in Free plus Best model unlimited, unlimited s | Free plan with 720p recording and 5GB storage. Pro plan $5/month with 4K recording, 50GB storage, and AI transcriptions. Team plan $8/month with 200GB storage and up to 10 teams. Additional 50GB storage $3/month or 100GB for $20/month. Prices shown with annual billing; 14-day money-back guarantee. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 45 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 20 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 26 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 6 | 27 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Apograph More alternatives to QuickSnip