Apograph vs LiveLingo
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Private, on-device transcription for iPhone | Real-time voice translation powered by AI |
| Stage | Startup | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2025 |
| Based in | Not given | US |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: unlimited recordings and imports, Fast and Balanced models, 99 languages, timed sentences, playback, spell check, text/Markdown/PDF export, Best model on 5 recordings, speaker separation on 3 recordings. Pro: one-time purchase, includes everything in Free plus Best model unlimited, unlimited s | Free: 3 minutes per day at livelingo.io/app, no account required. Pro: $19.99 USD per month for 300 minutes per month, translated phone calls, AI meeting memos, PDF export. Pro+: $29.99 USD per month for everything in Pro plus extended translated call minutes. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 18 +2 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 7 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 29 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 6 | 60 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Apograph More alternatives to LiveLingo